Serendipity, on Oct 28 2008, 01:17 PM, said:
Kaleidos
#21
Posted 28 October 2008 - 05:29 PM
#22
Posted 28 November 2008 - 06:53 PM
Oh joy.
I had a meeting with 2 colleagues from another school in an unnameable county near us today who told me how they had Kaleidos foisted on them by their LEA. (This is the fourth time this week I have heard this from colleagues!)
They are very unimpressed with how poor and slow it is. The representative/ salesman said to them that: "Kaleidos is in development at the moment and that is why it has problems." To which the reply was, "So why are you charging us for unfinished software?". The reply? "That's what it is like when you are on the cutting edge."
So...this term "cutting edge", I do not think it means what you think it means Mr Salesman!
But seriously, I am beginning to get quite fed up with this. Why ARE our colleagues in other schools being forced to use overpriced and inadequate software to run such an important thing as their VLE? Who are these people that keep buying it? Why are they allowed to get away with it? Why are we not making more of a noise about it as professionals before more of OUR money is wasted lining the pockets of a few I.T. companies who treat schools as cash-cows for their development programmes.
Grrr!!!
</rant ends>
#23
Posted 13 September 2009 - 07:52 AM
Also (and, yes, this is important but often so forgotten) it's a bit unsexy to look at: even the Inland Revenue's online income tax form looks more appealing. It is brash, the internet equivalent of flourescent strip lighting and polystyrene ceiling tiles.
I want it to be easy and fun to use, just like Myspace or Facebook is.... perhaps even be a little silly, if I want. Why is that verboten in a school environment? Why does Kaleidos have to have a personality bypass?
#24
Posted 13 September 2009 - 08:08 AM
gavin holden, on 06 September 2008 - 08:00 AM, said:
You are so right regarding IT skills. People who develop ANY material for use by others on a computer should also involve Luddites and skeptics at the consultation stage, not just the skilful and the converted.
I was asked to be on our Kaleidos steering group. I think Kaleidos is rubbish, therefore I'm on that group no more.
#25
Posted 13 September 2009 - 11:37 AM
kitsch, on 13 September 2009 - 08:08 AM, said:
#26
Posted 13 September 2009 - 02:42 PM
Speed is the main problem - the system is very slow. Secondly, there is no logic to the navigation - think of the best software where you can easily find your way around it - kaleidos is impenetrable for many. It is also very poor to look at - as mentioned above design is so important on the web - this was designed by a group of colour-blind hedgehogs in a bag (history joke there.)
#27
Posted 13 September 2009 - 03:40 PM
Surely there are some schools who are delighted with their provision from RM?
#28
Posted 13 September 2009 - 05:08 PM
Andrew Field, on 13 September 2009 - 03:40 PM, said:
Surely there are some schools who are delighted with their provision from RM?
Our school is based in Derbyshire, last year our LA chose Kaleidos as the VLE that all schools in Derbyshire would use. They took a two year contract and have had a rolling program providing training, installation and support which has been brilliant. I am the ICT Coordinator, and along with the headteacher, have been slowly rolling Kaleidos out to all members in the school community. I do like Kaleidos and so do the other users in our school. It is easy to use, the tools for blogs, wikis, discussions and interest spaces all look the same so ease of use is good. We have been a part of a pilot that tested the multi media tools (video, sound recorder, a sketch tool and an easier way to upload photographs). This allows all users aged 4-11 years to use the VLE. We have ran small projects running a summer blog, each week a different calss is in charge of the blog. Another project involved year 2 and year 4 pupils creating their own interest spaces and using the media tools. The children loved using the VLE and produced some excellent interest spaces. We had a transition blog for our year 6 leavers so we could keep in touch over the summer holidays and offer any support if they wanted it. Our next project is keeping a blog with a teacher on maternity leave.
The ease of use is the big plus, but there are a few things that I do not like. It looks cbbc-ish, plastic like and if you made a page public it would not look very professional. Permissions are a bit wobbley!! What ever permission you give to the main interest space carry down to blogs, discussions etc... If you want the children to add to a blog and be able to comment on blogs they have to have full permissions and then they could alter the main interest space. It runs fine at school but we are using an optical 'whatever' link to the interest which is very fast, it is slower at home which parents have commented on. So I would hate to be a school in the sticks with an ASDL connection!!
I am logging our school's progress with the implementation which you can check out here. We are a small school with a small budget and after seeing some of the prices schools outside of our county have paid we had a great deal and with all the support the LA are offering it has been the right path for us to take.
I have seen Moodle and been at talks given by teachers using Moodle and I do think their VLE's have looked more professional and more user friendly. We will get there though. My only worry is that the LA do not renew their contract with RM after the two year!! Hope that helps, if you want to know anything please ask and I will try to answer.
#29
Posted 15 September 2009 - 09:14 PM
goneunderground, on 13 September 2009 - 11:37 AM, said:
You are being very kind! I'm just worried about what will happen. I believe passionately in using the net for education so I want Kaleidos to work as it is all we have... I have therefore joined the group again.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












